Outside Source
Key Takeaways:
- Validators on Solana are approving SIMD-228, which aims to lower the annual inflation rate of SOL from 8% to a lower percentage that still provides long-term sustainability.
- They say SOL becomes stronger when inflation is deflated, they for its approach, they for its opposite, mainly through reduced staking rewards, and its impact on validator participation.
- The proposal is supporting Solana’s growing network as security and decentralization continue to be critical.
- So while regulatory uncertainty remains, heightened negotiation efforts in the SEC-Ripple case promise eventual clarity.
Solana Current Inflation Schedule
The Post-SIMD-228: The Moving Forward Of Solana Tokenomics
SIMD-228 details a significant change in the issuance of new SOL tokens, with the intent of optimizing inflation enough to ensure that staking rewards to validators are efficient and prevent token dilution. At present, Solana has an inflation rate at 8% per year, but in the long term, this drops to 1.5%. SIMD-228 proposes to accelerate this, with effect as follows:
This would also mean that SOL would be a less abundant asset, theoretically making it rise in price over time if there was less inflation. The economic model of Solana would trend towards deflationary over time. Supporters of SIMD-228 argue that it will combat inflation for long-term SOL holders and create a more equitable staking environment. Critics, however, say validators, which give the system security, could be penalized through a reduction in rewards, something that would undermine decentralization as smaller players exit the system.
The research team at RockawayX, a key Solana validator and early supporter, offered detailed insight on how the proposal would affect network security and validator distribution. Their primary concern? Is staking reward competitive enough to incentivize new validators but hold existing validators.
Market Capitalization of Solana
More News: Solaxy is Building the First Solana Layer-2: Can it Propel SOL to $500?
Lessons from Ethereum, Bitcoin on the Inflation Debate
Solana is not the first blockchain to reimagine its tokenomics. Other big networks have followed suit:
The migration of Ethereum to a proof-of-stake (PoS) system came with a new deflationary economic model, and here the supply of ETH would decrease, thanks to burning mechanisms.
To support its scarcity value proposition, Bitcoin’s reward halving events (which occur every four years) decrease miner rewards. The most important thing about these networks? Scarcity may make 1 BTC more valuable than 1 dollar, but it comes at the price of balanced incentives which keep the network secure.
This means that if Solana validators end up endorsing matters of SIMD-228, the network both might coalesce the store-of-value characteristics of SOL but also must ensure that it does so in a manner that rewards validators to remain incentivized to stay decentralized.
Regulatory Uncertainty: Fresh Negotiations Between Ripple and the SEC
Outside of Solana’s own governance, the crypto world is watching another monumental battle—SEC vs. Ripple. It is rumored that Ripple and the SEC are negotiating which will serve as a precedent for the regulation of cryptocurrencies in the U.S.
The suit, filed in 2020, is about whether XRP would be treated as a security. Given that approximately all Layer-1 blockchains (including Solana, Ethereum, Avalanche, etc.) have positioned their private assets as crypto properties, a settlement would provide much-needed clarity on how crypto assets are to be regulated.
What’s Next? The role of SIMD-228 in the future of Solana
The validator vote on SIMD-228 has started and will determine the economic trajectory of Solana. Points of consideration are:
Are validators going to give up short-term staking reward for long-term value?
How does decreasing inflation affect SOL price and investor psychology?
This article first appeared at CryptoNinjas
