Outside Source
Swan Bitcoin sued former employees it alleged got help from Tether, and now accuses its own law firm of malpractice after it picked up the stablecoin issuer as a client.
News
Bitcoin financial services company Swan Bitcoin has sued Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, a law firm it still currently retains, after it hired a lawyer who is representing stablecoin issuer and rival crypto firm Tether.
Swan sued Gibson in California’s Superior Court on Nov. 22, accusing it of legal malpractice, claiming it “wooed and won Swan” to represent it against “former-partner-turned-adversary” Tether before the law firm “embraced Tether as a client and told Swan to get lost.”
Swan claimed one of Gibson’s lawyers called the firm’s CEO Cory Klippsten to warn Swan would need to find other counsel as the law firm hired lawyer Barry Berke, who represents Tether, and there could be a conflict of interest.
Swan — with Gibson as its legal counsel — sued a group of its former employees in September, accusing them of stealing software code to form a crypto-mining company called Proton Management.
Swan claims Proton had convinced Tether to cut ties with Swan to back Proton instead — allegations the firm denies. Tether is not named as a defendant in Swan’s lawsuit.
On Nov. 24, Gibson filed to withdraw as Swan’s lawyers in its case against Proton, saying “there has been a complete breakdown of the attorney-client relationship.”
It pointed to Swan’s suit against the law firm and claimed Swan told it that “it will ‘never’ pay the legal fees it owes” and “demanded millions of dollars” not to oppose Gibson withdrawing from the lawsuit.
Related: Court prolongs Tornado Cash developer Pertsev’s pre-trial detention
On Nov. 25, Swan asked the Superior Court of California for a temporary restraining order to stop Gibson from withdrawing from its case against Proton and block it from bringing on Tether as a client.
An excerpt of Swan’s complaint asking the court to stop Gibson from dropping the firm as a client. Source: Thomson Reuters
It claims Gibson is “in clear violation of the ‘Hot Potato’ Rule in attorney ethics” — a rule saying lawyers can’t drop a client by withdrawing from a case to avoid a conflict of interest.
A hearing for the restraining order is scheduled for Nov. 26.
Magazine: Legal issues surround the FBI’s creation of fake crypto tokens
This article first appeared at Cointelegraph.com News
